Got me thinkin’.
Can love really survive the non-existence of somebody who you cherished the most? Well, I would have to say that love, in such cases, may peter out. Love, as i have pondered, is something that would only grow robust if two individuals constantly bumped into each other. Nothing beats face to face encounter, I would say, for it is through such act that two individuals wholly and amply express everything they wish to say and be felt by the other. However, if one has completely vanished, then, I would perhaps infer that love, which has been held dear once, would now be consigned to oblivion.
Sad but I guess we just have to accept this reality as it is.
What say you???
I am so loving this info. I dare say, Glee won’t be worth watching if Lea Michele has to leave the show.
(Source: countboozy)
A moment ago the both of you were the closest and sweetest living creatures on earth; the next thing you knew the person whom you considered your very agreeable confidant abruptly changed and turned against you - nemesis as one may call. With just a flicker, everything has changed.
This often happens in my world. Lucky you’re not part of it! I am certain, indeed, that one may dwindle to subsist if one’s in it. Ofcourse, except me ‘coz I am not a stranger to this world-my world. And I have been invulnerable to what has been happening. It’s just that these things really are very odd.
Though I have been searching for its probable and attainable remedy, in reality, there are things which are beyond our control. With boldness we may do everything we could to appease what has been damaged, if the concerned party yearns not to conjoin, nothing good will come about. Even if we are faultless, even if we have pleaded, wept before the person, if that person is indifferent towards such deeds nothing pleasant will come to pass.
I am telling you beforehand not to trust a person wholeheartedly. Remember, odd things are just lurking around the corner.
Asked by tumblrbot
The sight of pen and paper for it is through them i am able to express my feelings at the moment. Instead of retaliating what others have done against me, i devote my time writing. Or could be the sight of books. Books appease me greatly. :)
(pls. allow me, i know this, obviously, is not the site for me to vent my feelings towards the film)
Yes. I have read these more than once. I was exceedingly entertained by them. Austen’s always has entertained me. However, I am very sorry to articulate that i was enormously disappointed when i saw the film. My creative part of mind and expressive emotions sensed when i was reading was very incomparable when i watched the film. And concerning the scenes, though i expected incoherence considering that the film was simply an adaptation, the inconsistencies were too numerous.
In persuasion:
In the novel, Miss Anne Elliot never gave a hint that she knew the Crofts rather she never knew the Crofts at all. She only gave a sense of familiarity when Mr. Shepherd shared about Mrs. Crofts being a sister of Captain Wentworth. However, in the film, when the very name Croft was mentioned, she abruptly reacted giving us the idea that she already knew them. Another was the giving of letter by Captain Wentworth, In the novel, Anne was in a room together with her relations and Wentworth who was writing the letter at the moment then hurried to go out with his friend giving the finished letter to Anne; however in the film, Anne, after reading the letter of Wentworth given by a friend whom she dared visiting herself, was chasing the Crofts hoping that Wentworth was with them . (the inconsistencies were too numerous to mention)
In Pride and Prejudice:
In the novel, Elizabeth Bennet met Mr. Darcy again while she and her aunt and uncle were strolling outside the vicinity of Pemberley. However, in the film, it was revealed that Lizzy met Mr.Darcy again in his own abode with his sister Gorgiana playing the pianoforte. This was not narrated in the novel. Another was the coming of Lady Catherine in Bennet’s abode. In the novel, it was stated that she came in at daylight asking Lizzy to get a stroll outside and there informed Lizzy regarding the betrothal of Miss de Bourgh and Mr. Darcy since infancy. However, in the film, Lady Catherine arrived nightly informing Lizzy of the betrothal inside Bennet’s abode.(many more inconsistencies)
We evolved.
Peeping through the obtrusive holes unveiling our joyous encounters in the past give us a conclusive evidence that we, indeed, evolved. We once perceived ourselves us crawling human beings which then were persistent of traveling through place on foot.Then time surpassed us, giving us a different sense of who we are. We now perceived ourselves as individuals capable of reasoning incessantly reaping the fruits of our maturity. This is evolution, i dare say. We change. We are changing beings. However, the change that we have gone through and we will go through was/is never directed nor limited by one aspect our existence alone, it has boundless limitations. Our physical aspect, on one hand, is changing, so does our emotional aspect.
Our emotional aspect is evolving, likewise.
Way back then, our expressive emotional aspect was already existent along when we we’re exuberantly benefiting from our egoistic desires as youngsters. Then and there, our emotional well-being was evolving. We easily sensed happiness when our longings and entreaties were instantaneously satisfied. Our tears abruptly roll on our features once we got wracked and tormented by our associates. Yet, all those shallow and insubstantial characteristics of ours petered out or rather evolved as we cross the threshold of maturity.
See! Change. Evolution.